Hero textpages child desktop X2
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Treatment Options - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

Treatment options depend on the severity of OSA.


The level of evidence for treatment options on this page is based on GRADE ratings.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31


Treatment options should be considered, depending on the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), body mass index (BMI), symptoms (See Assessment – History), comorbidities (See Comorbidities & Complications), possible pathophysiological background and preference of the patient (CPAP clinical pathway - HealthPathways).


The continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device delivers pressurised air to a patient’s airway via a pump and mask which is worn during sleep to create a positive pharyngeal transmural pressure so that the intraluminal pressure exceeds the surrounding pressure and prevents collapse (i.e. apnoeas, hypopnoeas), also through increased end-expiratory lung volume. CPAP has been the standard treatment for OSA since 1981. CPAP machines vary in prices from ~$750 to ~$2,000 with Australian Health Fund Rebates of ~$500-$1,000.


There are a variety of CPAP interfaces/masks available, including:

  • Nasal mask which covers the nose but not mouth
  • Full face (oronasal) mask which covers the nose and mouth, allowing mouth breathing during therapy (eg patients with nasal obstruction
  • Nasal pillows which consist of prongs that insert directly into the nostrils, so no components are pressing on the nasal bridge


Table. The most common modes of positive airway pressure

  • Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP): Delivers a constant positive airway pressure with a pressure relief setting (lowers the positive airway pressure at the onset of exhalation to improve comfort and tolerance of the device) and is the simplest, most familiar and best studied
  • Autotitrating positive airway pressure (APAP): increases or decreases the level of positive airway pressure in response to a change in airflow, a change in circuit pressure, or a vibratory snore
  • Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP): delivers a pre-set inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP)


It has been reported that APAP 32, 33 and BiPAP 34 are comparable to CPAP for the management of OSA. However, BiPAP is less commonly used and tends to be reserved for patients requiring very high CPAP pressures, who have obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, neuromuscular disorders or other conditions causing type 2 respiratory failure.

With CPAP titration, an in-laboratory CPAP sleep study is used to determine the optimal pressure required to control the obstructive events. Whilst the patient is undergoing PSG monitoring, CPAP is commenced at a low pressure and the pressure level is progressively increased over the course of the night to determine the lowest pressure that successfully abolishes the obstructive respiratory events, restores normal oxygen saturations, and improves sleep quality. A fixed pressure CPAP device can then be set to the appropriate setting and trialled at home by the patient. The optimal pressure will generally be between 5 and 20 centimetre of water (cmH2O).

Alternatively, APAP devices can be trialled at home to determine the optimal pressure. The machine has a built-in algorithm to automatically adjust the pressure according to detected obstructive events, within a set pressure range (e.g. minimum 5, maximum 20 cmH2O).

APAP devices can be either set in a fixed pressure mode or run in an automatically titrating mode for long term therapy. However, these devices may be more expensive than standard fixed pressure machines. Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that automatically titrating CPAP is superior to fixed pressure CPAP when used in the long term.

A humidification system is available built into or can be added on to CPAP or APAP devices to moisturise the air and reduce nasal discomfort and dryness. Nasal discomfort can also be temporarily managed by using non-medicated nasal moisturizing products available over the counter.



Efficacy of CPAP
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine performed a meta-analysis and GRADE assessment on the effectiveness of CPAP which was published in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine in 2019 and concluded that CPAP compared to no treatment results in a clinically significant reduction in disease severity, sleepiness, blood pressure, and motor vehicle accidents, and improvement in sleep-related quality of life in adults with OSA. 23

An improvement in sleepiness symptoms, including a reduction in related traffic accidents 35 can be achieved following therapy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).36, 37


Table. CPAP vs. control

Apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI)

High GRADE

CPAP, when compared to control, reduces AHI (associated with higher baseline AHI) 23,26,24

The meta-analyses of Patil 23, Sharples 26 and Qaseem 24 reported a significant improvement in AHI following treatment with CPAP when compared to control / sham CPAP.

Patil 23 reported, based on 11 included RCTs, a clinically significant pooled reduction in AHI of −29 events per hour (95% CI -37, -20) an AHI reduction of 86% (mean pre treatment AHI was 32.7 ± 12.6 events per hour and posttreatment AHI was 4.1 ± 5.6 events per hour).

Sharples 26 reported, based on 25 included studies, a pooled reduction in AHI of -25.4 events per hour (95% CI -30.67, -20.07) of CPAP compared to control, with a greater effect in patients with a higher baseline AHI; a decrease of -39.8 vs. -13.7 in patients with a AHI baseline of > 30 compared to 5 – 14.

Qaseem 24 reported, based on 7 included studies, a pooled reduction in AHI of -19.9 events per hour (95% CI -26.1, -13.7; baseline AHI 10 – 65 ) of CPAP compared to control, and, based on 8 included studies, a pooled reduction in AHI of -46.6 events per hour (95% CI -57.0, -35.8; baseline AHI 22 – 68 ) of compared to sham CPAP, with a greater effect in patients with a higher baseline AHI in both analyses.

Clinically relevant decrease in AHI is ≥15 events per hour. 23

Sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS))

High GRADE

CPAP, when compared to control, significantly reduces sleepiness (associated with higher baseline ESS or AHI) 23,3,26,2,24

The meta-analyses of Patil 23; Campos-Rodriguez 3; Sharples 26; Bratton 38 Qaseem 24 reported a significant improvement in sleepiness, as measured with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), following treatment with CPAP compared to control / sham CPAP.

Patil 23 reported, based on 38 included RCTs, a clinically significant pooled reduction in self-reported sleepiness of -2.4 points ESS (95% CI -2.8, -1.9) for CPAP compared to control.

Campos-Rodriquez 3 reported a pooled reduction in sleepiness of -2.92 points ESS (95% CI -3.73, -2.11) for CPAP compared to control.

Sharples 26 reported, based on 38 included studies, a pooled reduction in sleepiness of -2.2 points ESS (95% 95% CI -2.8 to -1.7) for CPAP compared to control, with a greater effect in patients with a higher baseline ESS score; a decrease of -2.64 (95% CI -3.44, -1.84) vs. -1.23 (95% CI -2.19, -0.27) in patients with an AHI baseline of > 30 compared to 5 – 14.

Bratton 2 reported a pooled reduction in sleepiness of -2.5 points ESS (95% CI -2.9 to -2.0) for CPAP compared to control, with a greater effect in patients with a higher baseline ESS score.

Qaseem 24 reported a pooled reduction in sleepiness of -2.37 points ESS (95% 95% CI -3.23, -1.51) for CPAP compared to control and of -2.5 (95% CI -3.5, -1.5) for CPAP compared to sham CPAP.

Clinically relevant decrease in sleepiness is 2 points ESS.

Quality of life

Moderate-High GRADE

CPAP, when compared to control, may lead to an improvement in quality of life 23,24,3

Patil 23 reported, based on 19 included RCTs, a clinically significant improvement in sleep-related quality of life, but not overall QOL in adults with OSA.

Campos-Rodriquez 3 reported a significant improvement in quality of life, as measured with the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire (QSQ), for CPAP compared to control.

Qaseem 24 reported, based on 7 included studies, no significant effect of CPAP when compared to control on quality of life, as measured with the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF36).

Mood – depression and anxiety

CPAP, when compared to control, leads to an improvement in mood, including depression and anxiety 31
Cognitive functioning

Low GRADE

CPAP, when compared to control, may lead to a small improvement in some cognitive domains 22,16,24

Qaseem 24 reported a significant effect of CPAP when compared to control on 11 comparisons (5 studies) out of 82 comparisons (15 studies) of cognitive functioning. Pan 39(13 included studies), Kylstra 16 reported no significant effect of CPAP when compared to control on cognitive functioning - there was a slight trend towards improvement in some cognitive domains after treatment with CPAP.



Table. Auto vs. fixed CPAP

Apnoea- hypopnoea index (AHI)

Moderate GRADE

Auto and fixed CPAP are equally effective in reducing AHI 24,11,14
Sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS))

Moderate GRADE

Auto, when compared to fixed, CPAP has a slightly greater effect in reducing sleepiness 24,11,14
Quality of life

Low GRADE

Auto and fixed CPAP equally affect quality of life 24,14



Table. CPAP vs. mandibular advancement splint (MAS)

Apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI)

Moderate GRADE

CPAP, when compared to MAS, reduces AHI to a greater extent 26,21,5,17, Medical Advisory Secretary Ontario 2009

Sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS))
Moderate GRADE
CPAP, when compared to MAS, reduces sleepiness to a greater extent in OSA patients with an AHI ≥30 but both seem equally effective in reducing sleepiness in OSA patients with an AHI 5 – 30 26,2,6,17



Efficacy of CPAP on Co-morbidities

While a previous observational study demonstrated a decrease in the incidence of fatal and non-fatal cardiac events in men with severe OSA treated with CPAP , as well as a reduction in the incidence of fatal events from the levels observed in those with untreated severe OSA compared to that of control subjects and snorers over a 10 year period 19, the more recent SAVE study (randomised controlled study of CPAP for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in moderate to severe OSA), did not show a reduction in mortality or cardiovascular events with CPAP 20. However, improvements in daytime sleepiness, quality of life, mood and work attendance were observed 19,20.

Table. Effects of CPAP on co-morbidities

Blood pressure

Moderate GRADE

CPAP treatment reduces blood pressure, particularly nocturnal systolic blood pressure, to a small extent in patients with OSA, and a larger extent in patients with moderate to severe OSA and resistant hypertension 23,28,25
Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
CPAP treatment does not reduce the risk of (primary) stroke in patients with OSA 12,15
Cardiovascular events
CPAP treatment does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with OSA 23,30,12,20,15,4,8

Patil 23 reported that the meta-analysis did not demonstrate a clinically significant reduction in all-cause mortality with the use of PAP. Several large trials showed no clinically significant impact of CPAP therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Atrial fibrillation

Low GRADE

CPAP treatment may reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence in OSA patients 27
Mortality

Very low GRADE

CPAP treatment may reduce the risk of death in OSA patients - the results are, however, not clear 10,12
Glucose metabolism

High GRADE

CPAP treatment appears to have no effect on HbA1c and insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes and OSA 23,9,18

Patil 23 reported that analyses do not support that CPAP reduces fasting glucose or haemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) in adults with OSA with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The Sleep Apnea Cardiovascular Endpoints (SAVE) trial 18 concluded that there is no evidence that CPAP therapy over several years affects glycaemic control in those with diabetes or prediabetes or diabetes risk over standard-of-care treatment.


The GRADE system


The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system provides a transparent approach to grading quality (or certainty) of evidence and strength of recommendations. Many international organizations have provided input into the development of the GRADE approach which is now considered the standard in guideline development.

The OSA resource’s treatment-options GRADE-evidence ratings are based on the recommendations of the Dutch Medical Specialists Federation ‘Federatie Medisch Specialisten (www.kennisinstituut.nl)’ published in ‘Obstructief slaapapneu (OSA) bij volwassenen’ on June 1st 2018 (https://richtlijnendatabase.nl). And the American Academy of Sleep Medicine’s most recent meta-analysis and GRADE assessment on the effectiveness of CPAP. 23

Further clinical practice guidelines for the management of OSA in adults reviewed include the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 23, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 40, 41, the American Cllege of Physicians (ACP) 24, the Canadian Thoracic Society 42 and the International Geriatric Sleep Medicine Taskforce.43


Abbreviations

AHI - Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index
BBTi - Brief Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia
BMI - Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
BQ - Berlin Questionnaire
CBTi - Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia
CELL - Coblation Endoscopic Lingual Lightening
COPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
CVA - Cerebrovascular Accident
CPAP - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
CSA - Central Sleep Apnoea
DASS - Depression Anxiety Stress Scale
DBAS - Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep
DBP - Diastolic Blood Pressure
DIMS - Difficulties Initiating and/or Maintaining Sleep
DISE - Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy
DISS - Daytime Insomnia Symptom Scale
ENT - Ear Nose and Throat
ESS - Epworth Sleepiness Scale
FOSQ - Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire
FSH - Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
FTP - Friedman Tong Position
GP - General Practitioner
HANDI - RACGP Handbook of Non-Drug Interventions
HGNS - Hypoglossal Herve Htimulation
ISI - Insomnia Severity Index
K10 - Kessler Psychological Distress Scale
MAD - Mandibular Advancement Device
MAS - Mandibular Advancement Rplint
MBS - Medicare Benefits Schedule
MMA - Maxillomandibular Advancement Surgery
MRA - Mandibular Repositioning Appliance
ODI - Oxygenation Desaturation Index
OSA - Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
PLMD - Periodic Limb Movement Disorder
PT - Positional Therapy
PTSD - Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
PSG - Polysomnography
QSQ - Quebec Sleep Questionnaire
REM - Rapid Eye Movement
RFTB - Radiofrequency Thermotherapy of the Tongue Base
SBP - Systolic Blood Pressure
SCI - Sleep Condition Indicator
SE - Sleep Efficiency
SF36 - Short-Form (36) Health Survey
SMILE - Submucosal Minimally Invasive Lingual Excision
SNRIs - Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors
SOL - Sleep Onset Latency
SSRI - Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
TFTs - Thyroid Function Tests
TIB - Time In Bed
TORS - Transoral Robotic Surgery
TST - Total Sleep Time
UPPP - Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
WASO - Wake After Sleep Onset

Quick links

References

  1. Barbe F, et al. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the incidence of hypertension and cardiovascular events in nonsleepy patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;307(20):2161–68
  2. Bratton DJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices on sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a network meta-analysis.(Erratum appears in Lancet Respir Med 2015;3(12):e44; PMID: 26679034) The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2015;3(11):869-78
  3. Campos-Rodriguz F, et al., Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Improves Quality of Life in Women with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Randomiz ed Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194(10):1286-94
  4. Chai-Coetzer CL, et al. Predictors of long-term adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease in the SAVE study. Sleep 2013;36:1929–37
  5. Doff MH, et al. Long-term oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a controlled study on dental side effects. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(2):475-82
  6. Doff MH, et al. Oral appliance versus continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 2-year follow-up. Sleep 2013;36(9):1289-96
  7. El-Solh AA, et al. Combined oral appliance and positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A pilot study. Sleep and Breathing 2011;15(2):203-8
  8. Esquinas C, et al. Spanish Sleep Network. Rationale and methodology of the impact of continuous positive airway pressure on patients with ACS and nonsleepy OSA: the ISAACC Trial. Clin Cardiol 2013;36:495–501
  9. Feng Y, Zhang Z, Dong ZZ. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity and body mass index in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine 2015;25:15005
  10. Fu Y, et al. Meta-analysis of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in obstructive sleep apnea with or without continuous positive airway pressure treatment. Sleep & Breathing 2016;8:8
  11. Gao W, et al. Is automatic CPAP titration as effective as manual CPAP titration in OSAHS patients? A metaanalysis. Sleep & Breathing 2012;16(2):329-40
  12. Guo J, et al. Effect of CPAP therapy on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Sleep & Breathing 2016;12:12
  13. Health Quality O. Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 2009;9(5):1-51
  14. Ip S, et al. Auto-titrating versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Systems Review 2012;1:20
  15. Kim Y, et al. Can Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Reduce the Risk of Stroke in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PloS ONE (Electronic Resource) 2016;11(1):e0146317
  16. Kylstra WA, et al. Neuropsychological functioning after CPAP treatment in obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews 2013;17(5):341-7
  17. Li W, Xiao L, Hu J. The comparison of CPAP and oral appliances in treatment of patients with OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiratory Care 2013;58(7):1184-95
  18. Loffler KA, et al. SAVE Substudy Investigators. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment, Glycemia, and Diabetes Risk in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Comorbid Cardiovascular Disease Diabetes Care 2020:dc192006
  19. Marin JM, et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet 2005;365:1046–53
  20. McEvoy RD, et al. CPAP for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:919–31
  21. Okuno K, et al. The effect of oral appliances that advanced the mandible forward and limited mouth opening in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2014;41(7):542-54
  22. Pan YY, et al. Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Cognitive Deficits in Middle-aged Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Meta-analysis of Randomiz ed Controlled Trials. Chinese Medical Journal 2015;128(17):2365-73
  23. Patil SP, et al. Treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea with positive airway pressure: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. J Clin Sleep Med 2019;15(2):301-34
  24. Qaseem A, et al. Management of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2013;159(7):471-83
  25. Schein AS, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure reduces blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea; a systematic review and meta-analysis with 1000 patients. Journal of Hypertension 2014;32(9):1762-73
  26. Sharples LD, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of oral mandibular advancement devices and continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea. Sleep Medicine Reviews 2016;27:108-24
  27. Shukla A, et al. Effect of obstructive sleep apnea treatment on atrial fibrillation recurrence: A metaanalysis. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology 2015;1(1-2):41-51
  28. Sun Y, et al. CPAP therapy reduces blood pressure for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: An update meta-analysis of randomiz ed clinical trials. Acta Cardiologica 2016;71(3):275-80
  29. Vicini C, et al. Surgery versus ventilation in adult severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. American Journal of Otolaryngology 2010;31(1):14-20
  30. Yu J, et al. Association of positive airway pressure with cardiovascular events and death in adults with sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2017;318(2):156-66
  31. Zheng D, et al. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: results from the sleep apnoea cardiovascular Endpoint randomised trial and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2019;11:89-96
  32. Pépin JL, et al. Fixed-pressure CPAP versus auto-adjusting CPAP: comparison of efficacy on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea, a randomised clinical trial. Thorax 2016;71:72
  33. Carlucci A, et al. Efficacy of Bilevel-auto Treatment in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Not Responsive to or Intolerant of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation. J Clin Sleep Med 2015;11:981
  34. Reeves-Hoché MK, et al. Continuous versus bilevel positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:443
  35. Tregear S, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure reduces risk of motor vehicle crash among drivers with obstructive sleep apnea: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep 2010;33(10):1373-80
  36. Marshall NS, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure reduces daytime sleepiness in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea: a meta-analysis. Thorax 2006;61(5):430-4
  37. Patel SR, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for treating sleepiness in a diverse population with obstructive sleep apnea: results of a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(5):565-71
  38. Bratton DJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices on sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a network meta-analysis.(Erratum appears in Lancet Respir Med 2015;3(12):e44; PMID: 26679034) The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2015;3(11):869-78;
  39. Pan YY, et al. Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Cognitive Deficits in Middle-aged Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Meta-analysis of Randomiz ed Controlled Trials. Chinese Medical Journal 2015;128(17):2365-73
  40. Chowdhuri S, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement: Impact of Mild Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:e3
  41. Strohl KP, et al. An official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: sleep apnea, sleepiness, and driving risk in noncommercial drivers. An update of a 1994 Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:125
  42. Fleetham J, et al. The Canadian Thoracic Society Sleep Disordered Breathing Committee Diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Can Respir 2011;18(1):25-47
  43. Netzer NC, et al. Principles of practice parameters for the treatment of sleep disordered breathing in the elderly and frail elderly: the consensus of the International Geriatric Sleep Medicine Task Force. Eur Respir J 2016;48:992